> ## Content Index
> Fetch the complete content index at: https://www.nastycanuck.ca/llms.txt
> Use this file to discover other available public pages before exploring further.

# Alberta's Ten Answers Are In. Now What?
- URL: https://www.nastycanuck.ca/alberta-referendum-official-results-ten-questions/
- Published: 2026-10-30T20:40:54.000Z
- Updated: 2026-10-30T20:48:15.000Z
- Description: The count is official. Now Alberta must decide which proposals can become legislation and which require negotiation with Ottawa.
- Author: Nasty Canuck Editorial Desk
- Tags: News Briefs, Canadian Corner, Canadian Unity, Alberta

*Alberta's official referendum results show a decisive choice to remain in Canada, narrower majorities on immigration and voting proposals, and rejection of four proposed constitutional changes.*

Elections Alberta's [official October 19 results](https://www.elections.ab.ca/elections/referendum/referendum-results/), released October 29, record **1,556,316 valid votes to remain a province of Canada** and **520,233** to begin the legal process toward a future binding referendum on separation. The second option was not an immediate vote to leave Canada.

The province recorded **2,216,505 ballots cast on that question**, including declined and rejected ballots, among **3,148,205 eligible electors**. Turnout was **70.4 per cent**, compared with **60.5 per cent** in the 2023 provincial election. Turnout is calculated for that question; not every elector cast a valid vote on all ten questions.

## Five policy proposals won majority support

Majorities supported five proposals involving immigration, access to provincially funded services and proof of citizenship for provincial voting. According to the [official question-by-question tally](https://www.elections.ab.ca/elections/referendum/referendum-results/), **54.86 per cent** backed greater Alberta control over immigration. **52.46 per cent** supported restricting provincial-program eligibility by immigration status, with Canadian citizens, permanent residents and people holding Alberta-approved status remaining eligible. **53.12 per cent** favoured a 12-month residency requirement before people with non-permanent legal immigration status could access provincially funded social supports.

Support was tightest on charging fees or premiums to certain non-permanent residents using health care and education: **51.78 per cent** voted yes. The strongest result in this group was **58.06 per cent** in favour of requiring proof of citizenship to vote in provincial elections.

These votes endorse proposed policy directions. **They do not themselves enact any law.** Premier Danielle Smith [said October 22](https://calgary.citynews.ca/2026/10/22/premier-smith-to-proceed-with-caution-on-immigration-changes-following-referendum-results/) that her government would approach the narrower social-service results cautiously, seek discussions with Ottawa on immigration and make no changes in the fall legislative sitting, with more detail expected in spring 2027.

## Four constitutional proposals were rejected

All four proposals to seek amendments to Canada's Constitution failed. Voters rejected provincial selection of superior-court judges (**54.64 per cent no**), abolition of the Senate (**52.72 per cent no**), provincial withdrawal from federal programs without surrendering the associated funding (**57.56 per cent no**), and giving provincial laws priority over conflicting federal laws in specified areas (**55.83 per cent no**). These figures come from [Elections Alberta's official returns](https://www.elections.ab.ca/elections/referendum/referendum-results/).

## The ballot is finished. The governing work is not.

The [separation-question order](https://kings-printer.alberta.ca/Documents/Orders/Orders%5Fin%5FCouncil/2026/2026%5F160.pdf) and [immigration-questions order](https://kings-printer.alberta.ca/Documents/Orders/Orders%5Fin%5FCouncil/2026/2026%5F110.pdf) expressly made those results **non-binding**. Smith has [said she will not call another government separation referendum while she is premier](https://www.alberta.ca/premiers-address-to-the-province). The separate [citizen-initiative petition and associated court process](https://www.elections.ab.ca/resources/media/news-releases/ci-results-announced-sylvestre/) were not decided by this government-initiated ballot.

Immigration arrangements also require more than a referendum tally. [Section 95 of the Constitution Act, 1867](https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/const/section-95.html) allows both provincial and federal immigration legislation, while federal law prevails where they conflict. Any proposed provincial restrictions on services or voting would need their own legislation and legal scrutiny.

Before the vote, Nasty Canuck examined [what the referendum could actually decide](https://www.nastycanuck.ca/alberta-october-19-referendum-what-vote-decides/) and [how a separation process would work](https://www.nastycanuck.ca/how-canada-actually-comes-apart/). The official count now answers the first political question. The next test is which changes Alberta can make itself, which require Ottawa's agreement, and what survives legal scrutiny.